definitelynotscott (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
definitelynotscott) wrote2019-01-03 06:46 pm
definitelynotscott) wrote2019-01-03 06:46 pm
(no subject)
I know it's probably just me needing to learn to use the back button instead of sticking around, but there is some really inaccurate sex biology/anatomy/physics out there. I'm not even talking about the perennial "what/where is the hymen" problem that professional authors with entire editorial teams seem to have trouble with.
...Although there is a subset of authors who seem to have absorbed the "hymen usage is unrealistic" message and then just decided to swap it out with the cervix instead. No. Please. Do not. Especially if you're going to move on to breeding kink stuff. The cervix has necessary functions.
But if you're going to do some fringe robot/xeno stuff, getting the human anatomy/biology right leaves a lot more suspension of disbelief left for whatever robodicks/tentacles/ovipositors you're planning to throw in.
TLDR - I need to stop reading things containing kinks I'm uninterested in.
...Although there is a subset of authors who seem to have absorbed the "hymen usage is unrealistic" message and then just decided to swap it out with the cervix instead. No. Please. Do not. Especially if you're going to move on to breeding kink stuff. The cervix has necessary functions.
But if you're going to do some fringe robot/xeno stuff, getting the human anatomy/biology right leaves a lot more suspension of disbelief left for whatever robodicks/tentacles/ovipositors you're planning to throw in.
TLDR - I need to stop reading things containing kinks I'm uninterested in.